Table of Contents
NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments
NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments
![[SOLUTION] NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments Solution](https://helpinnursingessays.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/order-2-2-300x228.png)
Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
Review of Systems
Week 1 Case Study Assignment
Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to apply hypersensitivity pathophysiological concepts to explain assessment findings of a patient with Allergic Rhinitis. Students will examine all aspects of the patient’s assessment including: Chief Complaint (CC), History of Present Illness (HPI), Past Medical History (PMH), Family History (FH), Social History (SH), Review of Systems (ROS), and Medications and then answer the questions that follow on the provided Comprehensive Case Study template. Activity Learning Outcomes Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:- Analyze the case to arrive at the type of hypersensitivity reaction that the patient is exhibiting. (CO1) NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments Solution
- Explain the pathophysiology of the identified hypersensitivity reaction. (CO1)
- Identify all subjective and objective information provided in the case. (CO3)
- Explain, using pathophysiology, the rationale for each subjective and objective finding. (CO1, CO3) NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments
- Identify two types of medications that are strongly recommended for the treatment of allergic rhinitis according to the clinical practice guidelines on the management of allergic rhinitis. (CO2, CO5) NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments Solution
- Explain the mechanism of action of the two medication classifications and include how the symptoms of allergic rhinitis are alleviated when taken. (CO2, CO5)
[SOLUTION] NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments Solution
ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER
Week 1 Case Study template Pathophysiology & Clinical Findings of the Disease- Identify the correct hypersensitivity reaction:
- Explain the pathophysiology associated with the chosen hypersensitivity reaction:
- Identify at least three subjective findings from the case:
- Identify at least three objective findings from the case:
- Identify two strongly recommended medication classes for the treatment of the condition and provide an example (drug name) for each:
- Describe the mechanism of action for each of the medication classes identified above:
- Identify two treatment options that are NOT recommended (I.e., recommended against):
- Read the case study listed below.
- Refer to the rubric for grading requirements. NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments
- Utilizing the Week 1 Case Study Template Links to an external site., provide your responses to the case study questions listed below.
- You must use at least one scholarly reference to provide pathophysiology statements. For this class, use of the textbook for pathophysiology statements is acceptable. You may also use an appropriate evidence-based journal. NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments
- You must use the Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for the management of allergic rhinitis to answer the treatment recommendation questions. The guideline can be found at the following web address: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0194599814561600Links to an external site. .You may also use a medication administration reference such as Epocrates to provide medication names.
- Proper APA format (in-text citations, reference page, spelling, English language, and grammar) must be used.
- Identify the correct hypersensitivity reaction.
- Explain the pathophysiology associated with the chosen hypersensitivity reaction.
- Identify at least three subjective findings from the case.
- Identify at least three objective findings from the case. NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments
- Identify two strongly recommended medication classes for the treatment of the condition and provide an example (drug name) for each.
- Describe the mechanism of action for each of the medication classes identified above.
- Identify two treatment options that are NOT recommended (I.e., recommended against).
- NR507 Week 1 Case Study
| NR507 Week 1 Case Study | |||||||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Pathophysiology & Clinical Findings of the Disease The student: – Identifies the correct hypersensitivity reaction. – Explains the pathophysiology associated with the chosen hypersensitivity reaction. – Supports the pathophysiology statement with at least one appropriate, scholarly reference (textbook is acceptable for pathophysiology statements only). – Identifies at least three subjective findings from the case. – Identifies at least three objective findings from the case. (5 Required Elements) |
|
45 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Management of the Disease The student: – Utilizes the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support the chosen treatment recommendations. – Identifies two strongly recommended medication classes for the treatment of the condition and provides an example (drug name) for each. – Describes the mechanism of action for each of the medications identified. – Identifies two treatment options that are NOT recommended (I.e., recommended against). NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments |
|
45 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization, spelling, grammar & APA format The student: – Uses the week 1 case study template for case study responses. – Provides correct in-text citations for responses which match the reference page. – Has minimal spelling, grammar & APA format errors. |
|
10 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Late penalty deductions Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy. |
|
0 pts | |||||
| Total Points: 100 | |||||||
Week 2 case Study Assignment (NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments)
Purpose The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising knowledge regarding advanced nursing practice. Scholarly information obtained from credible sources as well as professional communication are required. NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments Application of information to professional experiences promotes the analysis and use of principles, knowledge, and information learned and related to real-life professional situations. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared. NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments Activity Learning OutcomesNR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments Solution
- Explain the pathophysiology of heart failure by analyzing a patient’s symptoms. (CO1)
- Differentiate between systolic and diastolic heart failure. (CO1)
- Explain the significance of physical exam and diagnostic findings in the diagnosis of heart failure. (CO4). NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments
- Read the case study below.
- In your initial discussion post, answer the questions related to the case scenario and support your response with at least one evidence-based reference by Wed., 11:59 pm MT.
- Provides a minimum of two responses weekly on separate days; e.g., replies to a post from a peer; AND faculty member’s question; OR two peers if no faculty question using appropriate resources, before Sun., 11:59 pm MT. NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments
- Differentiate between systolic and diastolic heart failure.
- State whether the patient is in systolic or diastolic heart failure.
- Explain the pathophysiology associated with each of the following symptoms: dyspnea on exertion, pitting edema, jugular vein distention, and orthopnea.
- Explain the significance of the presence of a 3rd heart sound and ejection fraction of 25%.
Week 3 Case Study Assignment
Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to apply hypersensitivity pathophysiological concepts to explain assessment findings of a patient with respiratory disease. . Students will examine all aspects of the patient’s assessment including: Chief Complaint (CC), History of Present Illness (HPI), Past Medical History (PMH), Family History (FH), Social History (SH), Review of Systems (ROS), and Medications and then answer the questions that follow on the provided Comprehensive Case Study template. NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments Activity Learning Outcomes Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:- Examine the case scenario and analyze the spirometry results to determine the most likely respiratory diagnosis. (CO1)
- Explain the pathophysiology of the respiratory disease. (CO1)
- Differentiate between subjective and objective findings which support the chosen diagnosis. (CO4). NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments
- Apply evidence-based practice guidelines to classify the severity of the respiratory disorder and employ an appropriate treatment plan. (CO1, CO5)
- Read the case study listed below.
- Refer to the rubric for grading requirements.
- Utilizing the Week 3 Case Study Template Links to an external site., provide your responses to the case study questions listed below.
- You must use at least one scholarly reference to provide pathophysiology statements. For this class, use of the textbook for pathophysiology statements is acceptable. You may also use an appropriate evidence-based journal.
- You must use the current Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for the management and prevention of COPD (GOLD Criteria) to answer the classification of severity and treatment recommendation questions. The most current guideline may be found at the following web address: https://goldcopd.org/Links to an external site.. At the website, locate the current year’s CPG and download a personal copy for use. You may also use a medication administration reference such as Epocrates to provide medication names.
- Proper APA format (in-text citations, reference page, spelling, English language, and grammar) must be used. NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments
- Hypertension
- Hyperlipidemia
- Atherosclerotic coronary artery disease
- Smoker
- Father deceased of acute coronary syndrome at age 65
- Mother deceased of breast cancer at age 58.
- One sister, alive, who is a 5 year breast cancer survivor.
- One son and one daughter with no significant medical history.
- 35 pack-year smoking history; he has cut down to one cigarette at bedtime following his cardiac intervention.
- Denies alcohol or recreational drug use
- Real estate agent
- Rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily by mouth
- Carvedilol 25 mg twice daily by mouth
- Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg once daily by mouth
- Aspirin 81mg daily by mouth
NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments Solution
- Constitutional: Denies fever, chills or weight loss. + Fatigue.
- HEENT: Denies nasal congestion, rhinorrhea or sore throat.
- Chest: + dyspnea with exertion. Denies productive cough or wheezing. + Dry, nonproductive cough in the AM.
- Heart: Denies chest pain, chest pressure or palpitations.
- Lymph: Denies lymph node swelling.
- Constitutional: Alert and oriented male in no apparent distress.
- Vital Signs: BP-120/84, T-97.9 F, P-62, RR-22, SaO2: 93%
- Wt. 180 lbs., Ht. 5’9″
- Eyes: Pupils equal, round and reactive to light and accommodation, normal conjunctiva.
- Ears: Tympanic membranes intact.
- Nose: Bilateral nasal turbinates without redness or swelling. Nares patent.
- Mouth: Oropharynx clear. No mouth lesions. Dentures well-fitting. Oral mucous membranes dry.
- Neck supple without JVD.
- No lymphadenopathy, masses or carotid bruits.
- Bilateral breath sounds clear throughout lung fields. + Bilaterally wheezes noted with forced exhalation along with a prolonged expiratory phase. No intercostal retractions.
- S1 and S2 regular rate and rhythm, no rubs or murmurs.
- Skin cool, pale and dry. Nail beds pink without clubbing.
- Lungs are hyper-inflated bilaterally with a flattened diaphragm. No effusions or infiltrates.
- Are the spirometry results consistent with obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease? What is the most likely pulmonary diagnosis for this patient?
- Explain the pathophysiology associated with the chosen pulmonary disease.
- Identify at least three subjective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis.
- Identify at least three objective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis
- Classify the patient’s disease severity. Is this considered stable or unstable?
- Identify two (2) “Evidence A” recommended medication classes for the treatment of this condition and provide an example (drug name) for each.
- Describe the mechanism of action for each of the medication classes identified above.
- Identify two (2) “Evidence A” recommended non-pharmacological treatment options for this patient.
NR507 Case Study Pathophysiology Assignments Solution