Module 6 Case Study: The Condescending Dental Hygienist
Read the attached case study with a focus on the key management issues. Using the resources provided at the end of this case study, answer the plan development and response questions as indicated in APA format. Use a minimum of 3 scholarly references, listed in APA format. Do not use personal opinion to complete this assignment, it is based on legal and ethical issues, use scholarly sources to find your answer.
- Read the case from the text on page 521
- Summarize the case
- Answer questions 1, 3-7 (omit question #2)
- Write out each question and prepare a detailed response for each question. Be specific and provide examples from the case study, text or other references.
- Format for paper (adherence to guidelines count for a significant amount in the homework assignment)
- Cover page (Title of the case; your name; date)
- Body of paper:
- Case Study Summary
- Answer questions #1; 3-7
- Each question should be typed out followed by a response to that question
- Please provide a thoughtful narrative with appropriate in text citations.
- Appropriate APA 6.0 format for in text citations
- Reference page using APA 6.0 format (included in rubric under adherence to guidelines)
- Double space your paper
- Use Times New Roman 12-point font and 1inch margin.
|A level||B level||C level||D level|
||Thorough and accurate adherence to guidelines; responds to all guidelines; Condescending Dental Hygienist includes all mandatory elements for the assignment; proper citations and complete; correct and placed correctly in text. (15 pts)||Majority of work displays accurate adherence to guidelines; responds to most guidelines; includes majority of mandatory elements; majority of citations complete, correct and placed correctly in text. (12 pts)||Some evidence of adherence to guidelines; Condescending Dental Hygienist some presence of mandatory elements; numerous incomplete citations, incorrect and placed incorrectly in text. (10.5 pts)||Insufficient adherence to guidelines; omits numerous mandatory elements; fails to respond to critical guidelines for content; if evidence offered, poorly cited in terms of completeness, accuracy and placement in text. (9 pts)|
|Condescending Dental Hygienist||Wide variety of sentence structures; excellent word usage, spelling, grammar, and punctuation; clear evidence of proofreading. (10 pts)||Good sentence variety; adequate use of wording, spelling, grammar, and punctuation; good evidence of proofreading. (8 pts)||Inconsistent sentence variety; often inadequate in wording, spelling, grammar, and punctuation; weak evidence of proofreading. (7 pts)||Writing lacks sentence variety; significant deficiencies in wording, spelling, grammar, and punctuation; lacks evidence of proofreading.(6 pts)|
|Condescending Dental Hygienist||Excellent, very clear description of the case, paraphrased with appropriate in text citations. (15 pts)||Good description of the case, paraphrased with proper in text citations. (12 pts)||Weak description with limited, inconsistent use of in text citations. (10.5 pts)||Summary lacks appropriate details and in text citations. (9 pts)|
|Condescending Dental Hygienist||Thorough, specific, accurate responses to questions demonstrating critical thinking and use of principles discussed in the text and lectures; evidence to support responses. (60 pts)||Good discussion and responses to questions; demonstrating critical thinking and use of principles discussed in the text and lecture; with evidence of sources used to support responses. (48 pts)||Weak responses to questions and discussion; weak evidence of critical thinking with insufficient evidence of sources used to support responses. (42 pts)||Discussion and responses to questions do not demonstrate an understanding of the concepts; lacks critical thinking and no evidence of source consulted to support responses. (36 pts)|